git blame [-c] [-b] [-l] [--root] [-t] [-f] [-n] [-s] [-p] [-w] [--incremental] [-L n,m] [-S <revs-file>] [-M] [-C] [-C] [--since=<date>] [<rev> | --contents <file> | --reverse <rev>] [--] <file>
Annotates each line in the given file with information from the revision which last modified the line. Optionally, start annotating from the given revision.
The command can also limit the range of lines annotated.
The report does not tell you anything about lines which have been deleted or replaced; you need to use a tool such as git-diff or the "pickaxe" interface briefly mentioned in the following paragraph.
Apart from supporting file annotation, git also supports searching the development history for when a code snippet occurred in a change. This makes it possible to track when a code snippet was added to a file, moved or copied between files, and eventually deleted or replaced. It works by searching for a text string in the diff. A small example:
$ git log --pretty=oneline -S'blame_usage' 5040f17eba15504bad66b14a645bddd9b015ebb7 blame -S <ancestry-file> ea4c7f9bf69e781dd0cd88d2bccb2bf5cc15c9a7 git-blame: Make the output
-b
--root
--show-stats
-L <start>,<end>
If <start> or <end> is a number, it specifies an absolute line number (lines count from 1).
This form will use the first line matching the given POSIX regex. If <end> is a regex, it will search starting at the line given by <start>.
This is only valid for <end> and will specify a number of lines before or after the line given by <start>.
-l
-t
-S <revs-file>
--reverse
-p, --porcelain
--incremental
--encoding=<encoding>
--contents <file>
--date <format>
-M|<num>|
<num> is optional but it is the lower bound on the number of alphanumeric characters that git must detect as moving within a file for it to associate those lines with the parent commit.
-C|<num>|
<num> is optional but it is the lower bound on the number of alphanumeric characters that git must detect as moving between files for it to associate those lines with the parent commit.
-h, --help
-c
--score-debug
-f, --show-name
-n, --show-number
-s
-w
In this format, each line is output after a header; the header at the minimum has the first line which has:
This header line is followed by the following information at least once for each commit:
The contents of the actual line is output after the above header, prefixed by a TAB. This is to allow adding more header elements later.
Unlike git-blame and git-annotate in older versions of git, the extent of the annotation can be limited to both line ranges and revision ranges. When you are interested in finding the origin for lines 40-60 for file foo, you can use the -L option like so (they mean the same thing --- both ask for 21 lines starting at line 40):
git blame -L 40,60 foo git blame -L 40,+21 foo
Also you can use a regular expression to specify the line range:
git blame -L '/^sub hello {/,/^}$/' foo
which limits the annotation to the body of the hello subroutine.
When you are not interested in changes older than version v2.6.18, or changes older than 3 weeks, you can use revision range specifiers similar to git-rev-list:
git blame v2.6.18.. -- foo git blame --since=3.weeks -- foo
When revision range specifiers are used to limit the annotation, lines that have not changed since the range boundary (either the commit v2.6.18 or the most recent commit that is more than 3 weeks old in the above example) are blamed for that range boundary commit.
A particularly useful way is to see if an added file has lines created by copy-and-paste from existing files. Sometimes this indicates that the developer was being sloppy and did not refactor the code properly. You can first find the commit that introduced the file with:
git log --diff-filter=A --pretty=short -- foo
and then annotate the change between the commit and its parents, using commit^! notation:
git blame -C -C -f $commit^! -- foo
When called with --incremental option, the command outputs the result as it is built. The output generally will talk about lines touched by more recent commits first (i.e. the lines will be annotated out of order) and is meant to be used by interactive viewers.
The output format is similar to the Porcelain format, but it does not contain the actual lines from the file that is being annotated.
<40-byte hex sha1> <sourceline> <resultline> <num_lines>
Line numbers count from 1.
"filename" <whitespace-quoted-filename-goes-here>
and thus it is really quite easy to parse for some line- and word-oriented parser (which should be quite natural for most scripting languages).
If the file .mailmap exists at the toplevel of the repository, or at the location pointed to by the mailmap.file configuration option, it is used to map author and committer names and email addresses to canonical real names and email addresses.
In the simple form, each line in the file consists of the canonical real name of an author, whitespace, and an email address used in the commit (enclosed by < and >) to map to the name. For example:
Proper Name <commit@email.xx>
The more complex forms are:
<proper@email.xx> <commit@email.xx>
which allows mailmap to replace only the email part of a commit, and:
Proper Name <proper@email.xx> <commit@email.xx>
which allows mailmap to replace both the name and the email of a commit matching the specified commit email address, and:
Proper Name <proper@email.xx> Commit Name <commit@email.xx>
which allows mailmap to replace both the name and the email of a commit matching both the specified commit name and email address.
Example 1: Your history contains commits by two authors, Jane and Joe, whose names appear in the repository under several forms:
Joe Developer <joe@example.com> Joe R. Developer <joe@example.com> Jane Doe <jane@example.com> Jane Doe <jane@laptop.(none)> Jane D. <jane@desktop.(none)>
Now suppose that Joe wants his middle name initial used, and Jane prefers her family name fully spelled out. A proper .mailmap file would look like:
Jane Doe <jane@desktop.(none)> Joe R. Developer <joe@example.com>
Note how there is no need for an entry for <m[blue]jane@laptopm[][1].(none)>, because the real name of that author is already correct.
Example 2: Your repository contains commits from the following authors:
nick1 <bugs@company.xx> nick2 <bugs@company.xx> nick2 <nick2@company.xx> santa <me@company.xx> claus <me@company.xx> CTO <cto@coompany.xx>
Then you might want a .mailmap file that looks like:
<cto@company.xx> <cto@coompany.xx> Some Dude <some@dude.xx> nick1 <bugs@company.xx> Other Author <other@author.xx> nick2 <bugs@company.xx> Other Author <other@author.xx> <nick2@company.xx> Santa Claus <santa.claus@northpole.xx> <me@company.xx>
Use hash # for comments that are either on their own line, or after the email address.
git-annotate(1)
Written by Junio C Hamano <m[blue]gitster@pobox.comm[][2]>
Part of the git(1) suite